No, it's Cymbals.
Banned
You're not as clever as you think you are.
rofl
Posts: 2,206
|
Lost
Dec 25, 2007 2:20:15 GMT -5
Post by No, it's Cymbals. on Dec 25, 2007 2:20:15 GMT -5
Topaz ftw
|
|
Samus
Banned: Until your internet is slower then mine! =o
It's true you know.
Posts: 89
|
Lost
Dec 25, 2007 5:36:26 GMT -5
Post by Samus on Dec 25, 2007 5:36:26 GMT -5
Meh, seems too empty. Black and white is better. =/
|
|
|
Lost
Dec 25, 2007 17:09:01 GMT -5
Post by R Ø G U € » on Dec 25, 2007 17:09:01 GMT -5
Hmmm... It looks unfinished? The BG has no depth, and the C4D's flow isn't excuted properly, IMO. That "border" is raping your sig's loins intwane. I would take that off. The text needs to be placed more appropriately and shrunk. Then it needs to be blended a little better. Right now, it's just an ominous word stalking your render... It takes away from your focal. The lighting looks off... And a little too strong or spread out. Here's an idea for you to try: Using a white radial gradient set it to "fade to transparent", and add a little at a time to get some lighting. (I never tried that before, so don't yell at me if it doesn't work.) The BG looks too simple, add more effects and like I said before: "add more depth". Hope that helped.
|
|
No, it's Cymbals.
Banned
You're not as clever as you think you are.
rofl
Posts: 2,206
|
Lost
Dec 25, 2007 20:43:27 GMT -5
Post by No, it's Cymbals. on Dec 25, 2007 20:43:27 GMT -5
Meh, seems too empty. Black and white is better. =/ This coming from the one whos like. SIMPLER SIGS!
|
|
Samus
Banned: Until your internet is slower then mine! =o
It's true you know.
Posts: 89
|
Lost
Dec 25, 2007 22:01:51 GMT -5
Post by Samus on Dec 25, 2007 22:01:51 GMT -5
Oh, Cymbals!! Well, in that case. Compared to the other stuff you make, I like this much more betterer.
|
|
No, it's Cymbals.
Banned
You're not as clever as you think you are.
rofl
Posts: 2,206
|
Lost
Dec 26, 2007 0:37:11 GMT -5
Post by No, it's Cymbals. on Dec 26, 2007 0:37:11 GMT -5
YAYZ ITS BETTERER!
|
|